RESUMO
The on-screen research, using a qualitative analysis methodology, using the hypothetical-deductive approach methods of a descriptive and analytical character, in the face of bibliographic research technique, where legislation, doctrine and jurisprudence is visited, aims to in order to analyze the various possible criminal types of framing in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.
RESUMO
The socioeconomic context and population vulnerability are directly associated with violence in the country. In Brazil, the Criminal Code provides the illicit act and punishes the aggressor who offends the physical aggression from a person. Interpersonal violence is an illegal act and is associated with the vulnerability of victims. Therefore, the study of the epidemiological profile of victims of interpersonal violence is needed to alert the population about their susceptibility. The present study aimed to design the epidemiological profile of victims of bodily injury from interpersonal violence in the region of Maringa, in the state of Parana, and to study the characterization of dental injuries in terms of permanent weakness and deformity. Four thousand nine hundred sixty-two reports performed between 2018 and 2020 were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Data collected included: sex, age, marital status, the region affected by the bodily injury, type of dental trauma, and responses to "weakness" or/and "permanent deformity". During the period studied, there was a prevalence of female victims (57.8%), white skin color (80.2%), aged between 21 and 30 years (24.9%), single (54.9%), and the most affected region was the upper limbs (32.1%). Regarding bodily injuries with dental involvement, 67 cases were reported, male victims were prevalent (60.3%), and dental fracture was highlighted with 54.4% of examined injuries. The implementation of the Forensic Dentistry Centre took place in August 2019 at the Medico-Legal Institute of Maringa. Also, with the interruption of expert activities in 2020 - due to the COVID-19 pandemic - relevant outcomes regarding permanent weakness were observed. The epidemiological profile of victims is characterized by the female sex, white skin color, the age group from 21 to 30 years old, and singles. Regarding dental trauma, male victims, and dental fractures were prevalent. Furthermore, there was an increase in the classification of "permanent weakness", as well as a slight increase in cases of "further assessment required" for permanent deformity.Copyright © 2023 Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirao Preto - U.S.P.. All rights reserved.
RESUMO
The removal of internal borders and the establishment of freedom of movement are important aspects of the EU's history, but they are not accompanied by a uniform legal system. The migrant dilemma isn't going away, and the pattern and character of these movements have evolved dramatically over the previous six decades. The author of this article addresses the issue of migrants' position in Serbia's rural areas during the coronavirus pandemic. During the period of emergency, Serbia enacted policies that imprisoned migrants in detention centres, effectively depriving them of their liberty. According to the government's reasoning, it was done to protect migrants' health. Given the rising violence between migrants and the local people, the question is whether the state intended to safeguard migrants' health or citizens from migrants in this manner. The author conducted a survey in these areas, explains the findings in depth, and draws a conclusion based on his findings. The paper is comprised of several units. In the first place, the author briefly explains the state of emergency in Serbia and gives an overview of migration centers in Serbia. The central part of this paper deals with the research between citizens in relation to migrants, both in their general attitude and in terms of the relationship between migrants and crime. Residents of migrants' areas were surveyed, as the author believed thought that due to the location of migration centres, they would be most affected by waves of migrants and possibly, crimes committed by migrants. The author set two initial hypotheses and both were confirmed, and according to the research, the population has a negative attitude towards migrants. At the same time, most respondents show distrust of the state's claim that migrants are imprisoned for their health. The author believes that this move by the state at that time was a hasty reaction in order to prevent the uncontrolled movement of migrants and the potential spread of the infectious coronavirus disease. In the same time, the author tries to answer to the question about the migrants' position today and in the near future.
RESUMO
The time has never been more appropriate than now for a discussion about the integration of history and criminology in Australia and New Zealand. Throughout 2020 and 2021, the people of both countries were subject to extraordinary government interventions into their daily lives to control the spread of the novel coronavirus. Given a respiratory pandemic of the same scale had not occurred for 100 years, we watched in real time as policymakers fumbled for guidance for the benefits and likely social consequences of imposing police-enforced legal restrictions on otherwise normal behaviours like freedom of movement and gathering with friends. Whether these were ultimately the correct decisions for controlling the disease is perhaps a question for others. Indeed, analysis of the interactions between the public and the state have always been the purview of criminologists and historians, yet we ceded this ground to epidemiologists who have little expertise in key issues of criminalisation and offending, or justice and policing, which are central to any system of state control.
RESUMO
Since the onset of COVID-19, visitation to correctional facilities has been in flux, including periods of nationwide suspensions for all in-person visits. Frequent, high-quality parent-child interactions are critical in preventing recidivism and beneficial for the healthy development of children with incarcerated parents. As more variants arise, prisons must reevaluate their family visitation policies to ensure that families stay connected yet safe. As a follow-up to a previous study, we documented how different jurisdictions, including all 50 states, the District of Columbia (D.C.), and the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP), communicated, via their websites, their response to COVID-19 and the changes to prison visitation policies. Using each jurisdiction's website as our primary data source, we gathered publicly available information related to each state's COVID-19 safety protocols and prison visitation policies, with special attention to policies pertaining to minors. Findings suggest that as of November and December 2021, all jurisdictions, except D.C., had resumed in-person family visits (n = 34;65.4%) or had announced their commitment to a phased return (n = 17;32.7%). Additionally, most states and D.C. (n = 35;65.7%) offered video visits to all of their prison residents (incarcerated individuals) and six states (11.5%) offered video visits to some of their residents, whereas 11 states and the Federal BOP (21.2%) did not offer any video visits as an alternative. Despite the continued need for safe, accessible, and family-friendly alternatives to in-person visits, 11 jurisdictions did not offer video visitation to their residents further straining families' ability to stay connected through the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)
RESUMO
The COVID-19 pandemic has challenged courts to implement practices that protect the health of both the administrators and consumers of justice during in-person proceedings, such as requiring the use of facemasks. Masks introduce interesting new questions for justice professionals. For example, what are potential jurors perceptions about masks' impact on communication? A survey of MTurkTM workers (N = 177) revealed respondents had a modest belief that masks could interfere with communication across actors, including the ability to understand information and assess "truth" in interactions. Respondents who were Native American, older, Catholic, Republican, and/or conservative tended to believe more strongly that masks interfere with communication. Implications of these findings for practice and future research are presented. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)
RESUMO
South African women remain vulnerable to gender-based violence, including femicide. Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) is a major and very complex public concern in the country currently. This makes IPV the most widespread method by which men perpetrate violence against women. It is not clear if women are empowered with IPV Information, Motivation and Behavior skills (IBM) to protect themselves against IPV occurrences. This article presents the developed PreCCL (prevention, community-based, corrective and law enforcement) strategies to empower women against intimate partner violence in Limpopo Province, South Africa. PreCCL strategies were developed based on qualitative and quantitative IBM (Information, Motivation and Behaviour) of IPV results as well as evidence-based information from the review of literature. Delphi technique was used to organize one stakeholder engagement meeting with a panel of 38 experts knowledgeable regarding Vhembe district IPV issues (namely managers from Vhembe Thohoyandou victim empowerment centre, members of the Executive council of the 6th administration of Limpopo provincial Legislatures, heads of departments or directors from the department of health, social development and community safety and security, chairperson of gender equity, TVEP managers, as well as women who were victims from Vhembe where the study was conducted, and chairperson of gender equity, disability women and children). The purpose of the stakeholder engagement meeting was consultation and buy-in of experts in the field regarding feasible and practical evidence-based intervention strategies for local communities. The setting for stakeholder engagement meeting was Vhembe District Tshifulanani at Munnandinnyi and Hadumasi the Victorious Community offices. However, due to COVID-19 regulations other stakeholders failed to attend, and the rating scales were emailed to them together with the PreCCL strategies. The participants were asked to rate the PreCCL strategies on a given Likert scale in terms of relevance, importance, potential effectiveness and recommendation for adoption. The 0.67 Cronbach Alpha reliability score of the Likert scale was found acceptable for this study. Of the 65 questionnaires sent out, only 38 were returned, which was 58.5% response rate. Data were analyzed quantitatively using SPSS. The strategies were rated relevant in addressing IPV in the district by most (n = 36;97,4%;Mean ± SD = 3.0 ± 0.7) of the stakeholder, whereby (n= 6;15.8%;Mean ± SD=3.8 ±1.2) strongly agreed and (n =30;78,9%) agreed. In terms of importance, most (n = 32;84.3%) of the respondents rated the strategies very important in addressing IPV in the communities. The strategies were rated potentially effective in addressing IPV by most (n =34;89.5%;Mean ± SD (3.2 ± 0.6) of the stakeholder. The majority (n = 34;89.6%) of the stakeholders recommended the adoption of the developed strategies in current state. Conclusion: PreCCL strategies to empower women against IPV occurrences, which were developed based on IBM qualitative and quantitative results as well as review of literature are considered relevant and potentially effective by stakeholder who recommend their adoption by the Department of Social Development, Limpopo Province.
RESUMO
The present work aims to provide the necessary theoretical support to determine whether it is possible to subsume some of the events that occurred in nursing homes during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic under the criminal types of reckless homicide and refusal to provide health care. This will be done through an analysis of the data that today can be considered less controversial and taking into account the few pronouncements made in this regard by the court decisions that have been issued so far on said events. Naturally, the objective is not to advocate for the initiation of prospective proceedings but, rather, to elucidate whether there is sufficient evidence to defend the posture that some of those events may have been criminal in nature. © 2022 Authors. All rights reserved.
RESUMO
La difusión de la pandemia de covid-19 ha generado la necesidad de revisar los límites válidos para la restricción de los derechos fundamentales. En este artículo se repasan las principales fuentes normativas y jurisprudenciales sobre las potestades estatales de regulación de los derechos, tanto para tiempos de normalidad como de emergencia.Alternate :The spread of the covid-19 pandemic has generated the need to review the valid limits for the restriction of fundamental rights. This paper reviews the main normative and jurisprudential sources on the state powers to regulate rights, both for times of normality and for emergencies.
RESUMO
La declaración del estado de alarma derivada de la pandemia del covid-19 ha supuesto, en el ámbito del contrato de viaje combinado, una sustancial alteración de los elementos del contrato: el objeto del mismo ha devenido imposible y la voluntad de las partes contratantes ha sido revocada, pues un gran número de viajeros no desean proseguir con la ejecución del viaje. A través del presente trabajo reflejaré cuáles son las situaciones ante las que se encuentra el viajero que ha visto frustrada la ejecución de su viaje combinado, así como las herramientas jurídicas y los derechos que le asisten. En este sentido, se describirán las consecuencias jurídicas que derivan del ejercicio del desistimiento, de la declaración de fuerza mayor y la pérdida de interés en el cumplimiento del contrato, los efectos de la imposibilidad sobrevenida y, por último, las concretas medidas adoptadas en virtud de los reales decretos leyes por los que se adoptan medidas complementarias para hacer frente al covid-19.Alternate :The announcement of the state of alert resulted by the covid-19 pandemic implied, inside the scope of package travel agreements, a significant alteration to the contract elements: its object has become imposible to fulfil and the will of the parties has been revoked due to a massive number of travellers who are not interested on continuing with the travel execution. By means of the present essay I will reveal which are the situations the traveller, whose package travel agreement has been frustrated, must face;as well as the legal tools and the rights that belong to the traveller. In this respect, legal consequences derived from the exercise of the right of withdrawal, the declaration of force majeure and loss of interest and, finally, the concrete measures adopted under the royal decree-laws concerning complementary measures to address covid-19 pandemic.